Florida civil litigation
Florida Civil Motion, Summary Judgment, and Deposition Checklist
A source-linked staff workflow for Florida civil motions, current summary-judgment procedure, hearings, and oral depositions.
Prepared and reviewed by the Law Firm Training Manual Editorial Team. Read our editorial and correction standards or report a correction.
Update note: Initial publication. The October 1, 2026 Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, July 1, 2026 general-practice rules, and current Florida Courts filing, case-management, technology, and rules-amendment sources were checked on October 3, 2026.
On this page
Freeze the authority set and select the correct procedural lane
A motion hearing, a summary-judgment motion or response, and an oral deposition are not interchangeable calendar events. Begin with the exact case, court, division, parties, assigned judge, lawyer-selected task, requested relief or discovery event, current docket, case-management and trial orders, applicable statewide rules, local administrative orders, and current judge procedures. Record the authority version and access date before building the work plan.
The responsible lawyer decides the motion or deposition type, legal basis, claims or defenses, relief, burden, record, witness or entity, scope, objections, privilege, evidence, discovery response, and deadlines. Staff can maintain source registers, exact-set control, filing and service evidence, logistics, status, and escalation without choosing a legal theory or treating a prior case’s procedure as controlling.
- Identify the operative case-management, trial, scheduling, discovery, confidentiality, and protective orders.
- Confirm the assigned division and current official procedures immediately before filing, scheduling, noticing, or serving.
- Keep statewide authority separate from circuit, county, division, and case-specific instructions.
Control an ordinary civil motion without importing the wrong rule
For an attorney-selected ordinary motion, create a control record for the requested relief, governing authority, supporting record, conferral decision, filing and service plan, hearing route, notice, court-delivery requirements, proposed order, and post-hearing proof. Rule 1.202 applies a prefiling conferral requirement to non-dispositive motions and lists exemptions, including summary judgment and other specified motions. The lawyer decides whether the motion is non-dispositive, whether an exemption applies, what good-faith conferral requires, and what the certificate must state.
Do not assume that an available hearing slot, a prior motion template, or a scheduler’s confirmation supplies authority to file or hear the motion. Case-management orders, local orders, assigned-judge procedures, emergency or expedited requirements, page or exhibit limits, courtesy-copy or submission rules, and a court’s directions may control or supplement the statewide rules.
- Record conferral facts exactly—method, date, participants, response, agreements, disagreements, and unsuccessful dialogue efforts—without scripting a legal position.
- Use the lawyer-approved motion, memorandum, declarations or affidavits, exhibits, notice, and proposed-order set.
- Route dispositive, emergency, sanctions, discovery, evidentiary, continuance, rehearing, and other specialized motions to their exact rule and procedure.
Use the current Rule 1.510 summary-judgment timing structure
The October 1, 2026 version of Rule 1.510 does not use the former statewide formulation that measured the motion and response as 40 and 20 days before the hearing. The current rule states that the movant must file and serve the motion consistent with court-ordered deadlines and serve its supporting factual position with the motion. It states that the nonmovant must serve a response, including the supporting factual position, no later than 40 days after service of the motion. The hearing must be at least 10 days after the response deadline unless the parties stipulate or the court orders otherwise.
Treat those rule statements as authority inputs, not permission for staff to calculate or select a case deadline. The lawyer must reconcile the current rule with the motion service event, case-management or trial order, court-set date, stipulation, judge procedures, extensions, amended filings, discovery posture, and any later rule change. Preserve the written calculation and approving lawyer rather than relying on a generic template date.
- Record motion service, response deadline, hearing constraint, court-ordered dates, stipulations, extensions, and later changes as distinct fields.
- Do not reuse a pre–October 1, 2026 summary-judgment deadline chart without current lawyer review.
- Escalate a hearing date that appears inconsistent with the current response structure or a controlling order.
Build a source-linked summary-judgment record map
Rule 1.510 requires a party asserting that a fact cannot be or is genuinely disputed to cite particular parts of record materials or address the absence of admissible support. Build the lawyer-approved factual-position table proposition by proposition, with the exact source, docket entry, page, paragraph, line, exhibit, quoted text, record status, and any contrary or missing material. Preserve the complete source separately from excerpts and demonstratives.
Staff does not label a proposition material, undisputed, admissible, proven, or sufficient; decide whether a claim or defense or part should be presented; select the burden; resolve objections; or determine relief. Those are lawyer decisions. Staff verifies that the approved proposition says what the cited source says, that the citation opens the correct material, and that every filed or delivered version uses the approved record reference.
- Separate pleadings, discovery responses, deposition excerpts, declarations or affidavits, documents, ESI, admissions, stipulations, judicial-notice material, and orders.
- Preserve contradictory sources and lawyer-decision-required items instead of silently selecting one account.
- Reconcile every cited record item to filing, service, confidentiality, redaction, and court-delivery instructions.
Separate filing, service, scheduling, and court delivery
A litigation event moves through distinct states. Preserve whether each document was approved, signed, submitted, accepted, docketed, served, delivered to the judge or uploaded through a separate court system, scheduled, noticed, amended, withdrawn, heard, orally ruled on, signed, and entered. One receipt or calendar invitation does not prove the other states.
Before release, verify the exact caption and case, document code and title, signature and verification, attachments and exhibit order, bookmarks or accessibility, confidentiality and redaction, service list and method, hearing details, proposed-order format, and any judge-specific delivery route. After release, compare the docket and service evidence with the approved set and preserve every rejection, correction, resubmission, and changed notice.
- Do not treat Portal submission, acceptance, or a hearing reservation as proof of service, judge delivery, notice, or entry of an order.
- Use the current assigned-judge procedure rather than a saved email, old website printout, or another division’s practice.
- Link county-specific scheduling work to the appropriate Broward, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, or other official workflow without restating it as a statewide rule.
Prepare an oral deposition as its own controlled event
For a lawyer-approved deposition, separately verify the deponent and capacity, party or nonparty status, entity designation if any, date and time, physical or remote location, officer and reporter, recording method, notice, subpoena, witness fee, interpreter or accommodation, production request, exhibits, confidentiality controls, technology test, and confirmation. A notice, subpoena, invitation, vendor booking, and witness confirmation are different artifacts.
Rule 1.310(b)(7) permits a deposition by communication technology only when the parties stipulate or the court orders it. The notice must state in its title that the deposition will be taken by communication technology, identify the specific technology, and provide instructions for access. Remote attendance is not the same as audiovisual recording; if the deposition will also be audiovisually recorded, Rule 1.310(b)(4)’s separate notice and recording requirements apply. Audiovisually recorded depositions must also be recorded stenographically, unless all parties agree otherwise, and the recording’s safeguarding and access requirements remain distinct controls.
- Keep a Rule 1.350 request to a party—including party-deponent production under Rule 1.310(b)(5)—separate from a nonparty deposition subpoena under Rules 1.310(b)(1) and 1.410(e), and from nonparty records-only production under Rule 1.351.
- Do not select an entity designee, coach testimony, decide topics or objections, waive privilege, alter testimony, or prepare an errata change without lawyer direction.
- Do not assume a deposition notice or transcript is filed; follow the current rule, court order, and lawyer instruction for any filing or court use.
Protect privilege, confidential material, and the integrity of the record
Apply confidentiality, privacy, sealing, redaction, privilege, work-product, protective-order, trade-secret, health-record, minor, safety, and accommodation holds before filing, service, exhibit exchange, vendor transfer, remote access, recording, or public presentation. Rule 1.020 and the general-practice rules address privacy and court records, but the lawyer decides what may be filed, withheld, redacted, sealed, used, or disclosed in the specific matter.
Preserve source records and approved working copies with stable identifiers. Limit vendor and participant access, use approved channels, verify shared links and permissions, and keep a disclosure record. If privileged or protected material may have been exposed, stop distribution and route notice, clawback, remediation, and court-action decisions to the lawyer.
- Do not use a public file converter, transcription service, AI tool, or personal account for protected litigation material unless specifically approved.
- Verify that public filing copies and judge or participant copies follow their separate confidentiality instructions.
- Carry confidentiality designations and protective-order limits into excerpts, demonstratives, transcript clips, and later use.
Reconcile the event through the signed or final record
After a hearing, preserve attendance, exhibits used, court directions, oral ruling notes attributed to their source, requested follow-up, proposed-order process, and the exact signed and entered order. An oral statement, minute entry, unsigned draft, signed order, and docketed or entered order are separate statuses. The lawyer decides the ruling’s meaning, compliance, rehearing, appeal, and downstream legal effect.
After a deposition, reconcile attendance, reporter and recording details, exhibits, objections or unresolved events, transcript order and receipt, errata or review activity, corrections, confidentiality, final certified record, and approved use. The lawyer controls testimony interpretation, designation, impeachment, motion or trial use, and whether another discovery or protective step is required.
Close the workflow only when the docket or transcript record, service and delivery proof, calendar, deadlines, outstanding evidence, next action, responsible owner, and unresolved exceptions agree. Reopen it when the court, witness, reporter, party, source record, order, or rule changes.
- Never convert hearing notes or a vendor status into a final court or transcript status.
- Preserve every material version and correction instead of replacing the earlier record.
- Assign each follow-up and verification date to a named owner before handoff.
Continue with the related workflow
Use these guides when the next step moves from general verification into a specific filing or scheduling workflow.
Florida civil litigation workflow checklist
Use this as a conversation starter with the person responsible for the work. Replace general language with the firm’s actual systems, owners, and procedures.
- The case, court, division, judge, lawyer-selected lane, responsible lawyer, assigned staff member, and objective are verified.
- Current statewide rules, case-management and trial orders, local orders, judge procedures, technology standards, and docket were checked.
- Ordinary motions, Rule 1.510 summary judgment, and oral depositions remain separate procedural lanes.
- Rule 1.202 applicability, exemptions, conferral, certificate wording, legal grounds, relief, and deadlines remain lawyer decisions.
- Summary-judgment timing uses the October 1, 2026 response-and-hearing structure plus controlling court orders, not the former 40/20-days-before-hearing formula.
- Every approved summary-judgment proposition maps to the exact record source and preserves contrary or unresolved material.
- Staff did not label facts material, undisputed, admissible, proven, or sufficient or decide claims, defenses, burdens, objections, or relief.
- The exact motion, response, reply if permitted, factual position, declarations or affidavits, exhibits, notice, and proposed-order sets remain version controlled.
- Filed, accepted, docketed, served, delivered to the judge, scheduled, noticed, heard, orally ruled, signed, and entered statuses are recorded separately.
- The deposition notice, subpoena, confirmation, reporter, communication-technology authority and access, recording method, production route, exhibits, accommodations, and technology are independently verified.
- Rule 1.350 party requests, Rule 1.310(b)(5) party-deponent production, Rules 1.310(b)(1) and 1.410(e) nonparty deposition subpoenas, and Rule 1.351 nonparty records-only production remain distinct.
- Privilege, work product, confidentiality, redaction, sealing, protective orders, trade secrets, health records, minors, safety, and accommodations were screened before release.
- The post-hearing order record or post-deposition transcript record is reconciled without treating an oral statement, draft, or vendor status as final.
- Every unresolved exception, deadline, follow-up, source refresh, and next action has a named owner and verification date.
Official references
These primary sources support the general operational controls discussed above. Check their current versions and follow the governing court, judge, clerk, software, and firm procedures for the actual work.
- Florida Rules of Civil Procedure — October 1, 2026 Compilation
The Florida Bar
- Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration — July 1, 2026 Compilation
The Florida Bar
- Civil Case Management Resources
Florida Courts
- Florida Courts Technology Standards
Florida Courts
- Florida Courts E-Filing Portal
Florida Courts E-Filing Authority
- Amendments to Approved Rules
Supreme Court of Florida
- Rules Regulating The Florida Bar — Chapter 4
The Florida Bar
Related lesson previews
Practice one workflow at a time
Florida Civil Litigation Operations
Prepare and Track a Florida Civil Litigation Motion and Hearing
Control an ordinary Florida civil motion from current authority and lawyer decisions through conferral, exact sets, filing, hearing logistics, and the signed outcome.
Preview lessonFlorida Civil Litigation Operations
Prepare and Track a Florida Civil Summary Judgment Motion and Hearing
Control a lawyer-selected Florida civil summary-judgment motion or response through exact record citations, frozen sets, hearing logistics, and the signed outcome.
Preview lessonFlorida Civil Litigation Operations
Prepare and Track a Florida Civil Deposition
Control a lawyer-selected Florida civil deposition from exact notice and participant confirmations through exhibits, event support, transcript review, and closure.
Preview lesson
